[c/*] remove suggestion to Google

This commit is contained in:
Boris Verkhovskiy 2024-04-08 07:08:01 -07:00
parent 216018a02e
commit a2b4f54dc6
4 changed files with 1 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -909,8 +909,7 @@ Node createLinkedList(int *vals, int len);
## Further Reading ## Further Reading
Best to find yourself a copy of [K&R, aka "The C Programming Language"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_C_Programming_Language) Best to find yourself a copy of [K&R, aka "The C Programming Language"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_C_Programming_Language). It is _the_ book about C, written by Dennis Ritchie, the creator of C, and Brian Kernighan. Be careful, though - it's ancient and it contains some
It is _the_ book about C, written by Dennis Ritchie, the creator of C, and Brian Kernighan. Be careful, though - it's ancient and it contains some
inaccuracies (well, ideas that are not considered good anymore) or now-changed practices. inaccuracies (well, ideas that are not considered good anymore) or now-changed practices.
Another good resource is [Learn C The Hard Way](http://learncodethehardway.org/c/) (not free). Another good resource is [Learn C The Hard Way](http://learncodethehardway.org/c/) (not free).
@ -921,6 +920,4 @@ It's very important to use proper spacing, indentation and to be consistent with
Readable code is better than clever code and fast code. For a good, sane coding style to adopt, see the Readable code is better than clever code and fast code. For a good, sane coding style to adopt, see the
[Linux kernel coding style](https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst). [Linux kernel coding style](https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst).
Other than that, Google is your friend.
[1] [Why isn't sizeof for a struct equal to the sum of sizeof of each member?](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/119123/why-isnt-sizeof-for-a-struct-equal-to-the-sum-of-sizeof-of-each-member) [1] [Why isn't sizeof for a struct equal to the sum of sizeof of each member?](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/119123/why-isnt-sizeof-for-a-struct-equal-to-the-sum-of-sizeof-of-each-member)

View File

@ -431,5 +431,3 @@ Es muy importante utilizar el espaciado y la sangría apropiados y ser coherente
con su estilo de codificación en general. El código legible es mejor que el con su estilo de codificación en general. El código legible es mejor que el
código rápido. Para adoptar un buen estilo de codificación, vea el código rápido. Para adoptar un buen estilo de codificación, vea el
[Estilo de codificación del kernel Linux] (https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/CodingStyle). [Estilo de codificación del kernel Linux] (https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/CodingStyle).
Aparte de eso, Google es tu amigo.

View File

@ -647,6 +647,4 @@ Se você tem uma pergunta, leia [compl.lang.c Frequently Asked Questions](http:/
Código legível é melhor que código 'esperto' e rápido. Para adotar um estilo de código bom e sensato, veja Código legível é melhor que código 'esperto' e rápido. Para adotar um estilo de código bom e sensato, veja
[Linux kernel coding style](https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/CodingStyle). [Linux kernel coding style](https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/CodingStyle).
Além disso, Google é teu amigo.
[1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/119123/why-isnt-sizeof-for-a-struct-equal-to-the-sum-of-sizeof-of-each-member [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/119123/why-isnt-sizeof-for-a-struct-equal-to-the-sum-of-sizeof-of-each-member

View File

@ -479,6 +479,4 @@ void str_reverse_through_pointer(char *str_in) {
Читаемый код лучше, чем красивый или быстрый код. Читаемый код лучше, чем красивый или быстрый код.
Чтобы научиться писать хороший код, почитайте [Linux kernel coding style](https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/CodingStyle). Чтобы научиться писать хороший код, почитайте [Linux kernel coding style](https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/CodingStyle).
Также не забывайте, что [Google](http://google.com) и [Яндекс](http://yandex.ru) – ваши хорошие друзья.
[1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/119123/why-isnt-sizeof-for-a-struct-equal-to-the-sum-of-sizeof-of-each-member [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/119123/why-isnt-sizeof-for-a-struct-equal-to-the-sum-of-sizeof-of-each-member