From be873f83fa818899a8b4bd29f1d3933e3be958c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Divay Prakash Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 02:02:54 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] Added content --- asymptotic-notation.html.markdown | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/asymptotic-notation.html.markdown b/asymptotic-notation.html.markdown index a516737e..fec2bcf3 100644 --- a/asymptotic-notation.html.markdown +++ b/asymptotic-notation.html.markdown @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ category: Algorithms & Data Structures name: Asymptotic Notation contributors: - ["Jake Prather", "http://github.com/JakeHP"] + - ["Divay Prakash", "http://github.com/divayprakash"] --- # Asymptotic Notations @@ -67,9 +68,10 @@ Exponential - a^n, where a is some constant ``` ### Big-O -Big-O, commonly written as O, is an Asymptotic Notation for the worst case, or ceiling of growth -for a given function. Say `f(n)` is your algorithm runtime, and `g(n)` is an arbitrary time complexity -you are trying to relate to your algorithm. `f(n)` is O(g(n)), if for any real constant c (c > 0), +Big-O, commonly written as **O**, is an Asymptotic Notation for the worst case, or ceiling of growth +for a given function. It provides us with an _**asymptotic uppper bound**_ for the growth rate of runtime of an algorithm. +Say `f(n)` is your algorithm runtime, and `g(n)` is an arbitrary time complexity +you are trying to relate to your algorithm. `f(n)` is O(g(n)), if for some real constant c (c > 0), `f(n)` <= `c g(n)` for every input size n (n > 0). *Example 1* @@ -114,10 +116,41 @@ Is there some constant c that satisfies this for all n? No, there isn't. `f(n)` is NOT O(g(n)). ### Big-Omega -Big-Omega, commonly written as Ω, is an Asymptotic Notation for the best case, or a floor growth rate -for a given function. +Big-Omega, commonly written as **Ω**, is an Asymptotic Notation for the best case, or a floor growth rate +for a given function. It provides us with an _**asymptotic lower bound**_ for the growth rate of runtime of an algorithm. -`f(n)` is Ω(g(n)), if for any real constant c (c > 0), `f(n)` is >= `c g(n)` for every input size n (n > 0). +`f(n)` is Ω(g(n)), if for some real constant c (c > 0), `f(n)` is >= `c g(n)` for every input size n (n > 0). + +### Note + +The asymptotic growth rates provided by big-O and big-omega notation may or may not be asymptotically tight. +Thus we use small-o and small-omega notation to denote bounds that are not asymptotically tight. + +### Small-o +Small-o, commanly written as **o**, is an Asymptotic Notation to denote the upper bound (that is not asmptotically tight) +on the growth rate of runtime of an algorithm. + +`f(n)` is o(g(n)), if for any real constant c (c > 0), `f(n)` is < `c g(n)` for every input size n (n > 0). + +The definitions of O-notation and o-notation are similar. The main difference is that in f(n) = O(g(n)), the bound f(n) <= g(n) +holds for _**some**_ constant c > 0, but in f(n) = o(g(n)), the bound f(n) < c g(n) holds for _**all**_ constants c > 0. + +### Small-omega +Small-omega, commanly written as **ω**, is an Asymptotic Notation to denote the lower bound (that is not asmptotically tight) +on the growth rate of runtime of an algorithm. + +`f(n)` is ω(g(n)), if for any real constant c (c > 0), `f(n)` is > `c g(n)` for every input size n (n > 0). + +The definitions of Ω-notation and ω-notation are similar. The main difference is that in f(n) = Ω(g(n)), the bound f(n) >= g(n) +holds for _**some**_ constant c > 0, but in f(n) = ω(g(n)), the bound f(n) > c g(n) holds for _**all**_ constants c > 0. + +### Theta +Theta, commonly written as **Θ**, is an Asymptotic Notation to denote the _**asmptotically tight bound**_ on the growth rate +of runtime of an algorithm. + +`f(n)` is Θ(g(n)), if for some real constants c1, c2 (c1 > 0, c2 > 0), `c1 g(n)` is < `f(n)` is < `c2 g(n)` for every input size n (n > 0). + +∴ `f(n)` is Θ(g(n)) implies `f(n)` is O(g(n)) as well as `f(n)` is Ω(g(n)). Feel free to head over to additional resources for examples on this. Big-O is the primary notation used for general algorithm time complexity.