mirror of
https://github.com/rspeer/wordfreq.git
synced 2024-12-23 17:31:41 +00:00
clarify the tokenize docstring
This commit is contained in:
parent
1793c1bb2e
commit
bfc17fea9f
@ -119,13 +119,14 @@ jieba_tokenize = None
|
||||
def tokenize(text, lang, include_punctuation=False, external_wordlist=False):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Tokenize this text in a way that's relatively simple but appropriate for
|
||||
the language.
|
||||
the language. Strings that are looked up in wordfreq will be run through
|
||||
this function first, so that they can be expected to match the data.
|
||||
|
||||
So far, this means:
|
||||
Here is what the tokenizer will do, depending on the language:
|
||||
|
||||
- Chinese will be mapped to Simplified Chinese characters and tokenized
|
||||
using the jieba tokenizer, on a custom word list of words that can be
|
||||
looked up in wordfreq.
|
||||
using the Jieba tokenizer, trained on a custom word list of words that
|
||||
can be looked up in wordfreq.
|
||||
|
||||
- Japanese will be delegated to the external mecab-python module. It will
|
||||
be NFKC normalized, which is stronger than NFC normalization.
|
||||
@ -146,15 +147,12 @@ def tokenize(text, lang, include_punctuation=False, external_wordlist=False):
|
||||
that mostly implements the Word Segmentation section of Unicode Annex
|
||||
#29. See `simple_tokenize` for details.
|
||||
|
||||
If `external_wordlist` is True, then the Chinese wordlist in wordfreq will
|
||||
not be used for tokenization. Instead, it will use the large wordlist
|
||||
packaged with the Jieba tokenizer, and it will leave Traditional Chinese
|
||||
characters as is. This will probably give more accurate tokenization, but
|
||||
the resulting tokens won't necessarily have word frequencies that can be
|
||||
looked up.
|
||||
|
||||
Strings that are looked up in wordfreq will be run through this function
|
||||
first, so that they can be expected to match the data.
|
||||
The `external_wordlist` option only affects Chinese tokenization. If it's
|
||||
True, then wordfreq will not use its own Chinese wordlist for tokenization.
|
||||
Instead, it will use the large wordlist packaged with the Jieba tokenizer,
|
||||
and it will leave Traditional Chinese characters as is. This will probably
|
||||
give more accurate tokenization, but the resulting tokens won't necessarily
|
||||
have word frequencies that can be looked up.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if lang == 'ja':
|
||||
return japanese_tokenize(text, include_punctuation)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user